![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:07 • Filed to: ebay | ![]() | ![]() |
2009 Spyker C8 Laviolette, 4.2L V8, Manual transmission, 1,575 miles for !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
SPLOOSH
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:14 |
|
Ah Spyker. So exotic, so crazy! I feel like it's a NP.
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:14 |
|
It would look so badass with a grey interior and black wheels, but the red and chrome just clash so horribly.
Still, that's a NP for being able to draw people away from a Bugatti at car shows.
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:18 |
|
No, the black, red and chrome do not clash.
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:20 |
|
Get rid of the red on the wheels and NP
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:20 |
|
Not gonna say that it's outright beautiful but it's definitely badass!
Also, dat shifter doe.
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:22 |
|
On both those cars, the chrome is used for metal trim, on the Spyker, it's a body color.
It's like having a black Audi R8 with a chrome sideblades and a bright red interior and wheels. It reminds me far too much of this:
The extremely tacky red vinyl interior in the C3 Corvette. Looking at it just smells like 30 year old dust.
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:26 |
|
I like red interiors.
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:39 |
|
Couple things... First, that is much cheaper than I expected, I always assumed Spykers were wildly expensive. Second, I am loving the Archer reference (assuming of course that it was intentional).
![]() 06/02/2014 at 19:46 |
|
It was.
![]() 06/02/2014 at 20:35 |
|
What Clevelander would buy that? I mean seriously, it's not American nor terribly plastic-y. What's up with that?
![]() 06/02/2014 at 20:37 |
|
One of these , maybe?
![]() 06/02/2014 at 20:42 |
|
Yes, but none of those people live in Cleveland for a reason. I'm talking someone that lives there. Wanna know the quintessential Cleveland car? (trust me I lived there)
![]() 06/02/2014 at 20:44 |
|
The dealer probably picked it up at an auction.
![]() 06/02/2014 at 20:47 |
|
This is true
![]() 06/03/2014 at 07:11 |
|
That is an ugly car...